Friday, May 6, 2022

Coverdale's Great Bible on This Day in History

 


This Day in History: King Henry VIII ordered English-language Bibles to be placed in every church on this day in 1541, and the Great Bible was provided for that purpose. The Great Bible was so named because of its size, it stood at 14 inches high. The Great Bible was prepared by Myles Coverdale who  included much from the Tyndale Bible. As the Tyndale Bible was incomplete, Coverdale translated the remaining books of the Old Testament and Apocrypha from the Latin Vulgate and German translations, rather than working from the original Greek, Hebrew and Aramaic texts. The Great Bible was also known by several other names as well: the Cromwell Bible, since Thomas Cromwell directed its publication; Whitchurch's Bible after its first English printer; the Chained Bible, since it was chained to prevent removal from the church. It has less accurately been termed Cranmer's Bible, since although Thomas Cranmer was not responsible for the translation, a preface by him appeared in the second edition.

While this Bible was allowed in churches, you were not allowed to take it home for study. 

Other early printed versions were the Geneva Bible (1560), notable for being the first Bible divided into verses and which negated the Divine Right of Kings; the Bishop's Bible (1568), which was an attempt by Elizabeth I to create a new authorized version; and the Authorized King James Version of 1611.

The first complete Roman Catholic Bible in English was the Douay–Rheims Bible, of which the New Testament portion was published in Rheims in 1582 and the Old Testament somewhat later in Douay in Gallicant Flanders. The Old Testament was completed by the time the New Testament was published but, due to extenuating circumstances and financial issues, it was not published until nearly three decades later, in two editions: the first released in 1609, and the rest of the OT in 1610. In this version, the seven deuterocanonical books (also known as the Apocrypha) are amongst the other books, as in the Latin Vulgate, rather than kept separate in an appendix. The Great Bible, as well as the 1611 King James Version also contained the Apocrypha.

Sunday, April 10, 2022

"And the Logos was [a] theos"

 

From https://christianityoriginal.com/mp/index.php/worship/john11

We find an interesting thing about Greek – It does not have indefinite articles (‘a’ or ‘an’).

If you wanted to say ‘I saw a tree’ in Greek, you would say ‘I saw tree’ and everyone would know you meant ‘a tree’. Therefore an English translator would automatically supply the ‘a’.

The Greek text of John 1:1 is as below. (We learnt about theos, the Greek word for god/God before).

    ‘In the beginning was the Logos, and the Logos was with the theos, and the Logos was [a] theos’.

Should the English translator supply the intended ‘a’ or not?

It’s remarkable that John uses the definite article in the first part - the Logos was with the theos, but deliberately leaves it out in the latter – and the Logos was [a] theos.

We notice the translators had no hesitation in supplying the ‘a’ for the ‘a god’ in Acts 28:6.

Applying the principle translators have used all over the New Testament, this should read in English as,

    ‘the Word was with God (the theos), and the Word was a god (theos).'

Yes, the Logos was with God Almighty in the beginning, and the Logos was a god - a mighty being. It could also be rendered as:

    ‘the Word was with the Almighty (the theos), and the Word was mighty (theos).'

1John 1:2 confirms this too. The same John wrote both texts about the same time, to essentially make the same point.

    John 1:1 says the Word was ‘with the theos’.

  1John 1:2 says the Word was ‘with the Father’.

This clearly shows whom John considered the theos (The God Almighty) - the Father.

........................End of website quote.......................

Now let's take a look at Isaiah 9:6. "For there has been a child born to us, there has been a son given to us; and the princely rule will come to be upon his shoulder. And his name will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace." NWT.

Now let's take a look at how other Bible translators have handled this passage:

Moffatt

"For a child has been born to us, a son has been given to us; the royal dignity he wears, and this the title that he bears––"A wonder of a counselor, a divine hero, a father for all time, a peaceful prince!"

Steven T. Byington

"For we have a child born to us, a son given to us,––and dominion rests on his shoulder, and he is named Wonder-Counselor, Divine Champion, Father Ever, Captain of Peace, for ample dominion and for endless peace"

Revised English Bible

"For a child has been born to us, a son is given to us; he will bear the symbol of dominion on his shoulder, and his title will be: Wonderful Counselor, Mighty Hero, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace."

New Revised Standard Version

"For a child has been born for us, a son given to us; authority rests upon his shoulders; and he is named Wonderful Counselor, Mighty god, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace." (notice the small "g")

Other translations might be offered, but these should be adequate to show how the words of Isaiah have been understood.

Friday, March 25, 2022

The Conception and Death of Christ on This Day in History

This Day in History: In early Christian tradition, March 25 came to be known as the day of Christ's death. Based on the dates when the Jewish Passover fell, early Christians had a fairly good idea when Christ died. Early Christian historian, Tertullian, said that the death of Christ happened on March 25. This then gave birth to a new theory that Christ's conception and death took place on the same day – March 25.

A religious holiday was then started to celebrate the angel Gabriel’s announcement to Mary that she was pregnant. (Luke 1:30-32). Roman Catholics call it the Feast of Annunciation and it is still celebrated on March 25.

March 25 after this began to grow in importance. It was declared that Adam was born on March 25, and Satan fell on the same day. "March 25 was thought to be both the day of the creation of Adam and Eve as well as the day of their disobedience in the Garden. It was also counted as the day when Lucifer fell from Heaven and when the Israelite people passed through the Red Sea to begin their journey to the promised land. Not surprisingly, tradition claims that it was also the day when Isaac was to be offered as a sacrifice by his father Abraham." Source

In fact, March 25 became New Years Day in 527 A.D.

It then became a logical leap to declare the birth of Jesus Christ 9 months later on December 25. Saint Augustine actually wrote of this: "For he [Jesus] is believed to have been conceived on 25th of March, upon which day also He suffered; so the womb of the virgin, in which He was conceived, where no one mortals was begotten, corresponds to the new grave in which he was buried, wherein was never laid, neither before him nor since. But he was born according to tradition, upon the December 25th."

Wednesday, March 16, 2022

The 1970 New English Bible on This Day in History

 

This day in history: The entire New English Bible was published on this day in 1970. The NEB is unique in that it was the first Protestant translation of the Bible made by a committee that abandoned the Tyndale/King James tradition. It was truly an ENGLISH Bible, as it was sponsored by the:

Baptist Union of Great Britain and Ireland
British and Foreign Bible Society
Church of England
Church of Scotland
Congregational Church in England and Wales
Council of Churches for Wales
Irish Council of Churches
London Yearly Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends
Methodist Church of Great Britain
National Bible Society of Scotland
Presbyterian Church of England

It was also very British in its use of "Whitsuntide" instead of "Pentecost" at 1 Corinthians 16:8. Luke 12:6 has "Are not sparrows five for twopence?" and Mark 12:42 uses the word "farthing." Mark 6:37 has "Are we to go and spend twenty pounds on bread and give them a meal?"

The New English Bible has retained the old English (thee, thou) only when God is addressed, for its respectful tone, but the NEB has also been criticized for its irreverence. For instance, it starts Genesis 11:1 with "Once upon a time..." This was changed in its successor The Revised English Bible. The NEB has also been criticized for "watering down the Deity of Christ", but then, as Bible scholar Rudolf Bultmann stated: "In describing Christ as _God_ the New Testament still exercises great restraint."

The translators of the New English Bible, much like those of the Good News Bible, chose to render their translation using a principle of translation called dynamic equivalence (also referred to as functional equivalence or thought-for-thought translation). C. H. Dodd, Vice-Chairman and Director of the Joint Committee, commented that the translators "...conceived our task to be that of understanding the original as precisely as we could... and then saying again in our own native idiom what we believed the author to be saying in his." Dodd goes on to summarize the translation of the New English Bible as "...free, it may be, rather than literal, but a faithful translation nevertheless, so far as we could compass it." As a result, the New English Bible is more of a paraphrase at times in order to render what they thought the original author was saying.

The New English Bible does make for great reading however: "I call him a pompous ignoramus. He is morbidly keen on mere verbal questions and quibbles...all typical of men who have let their reasoning powers become atrophied." 1 Timothy 6:4. "It is an intractable evil, charged with deadly venom." James 3:9. 

Still, I can't help thinking that the translators had a little fun. For instance, Joshua 15.18 reads “As she sat on the ass, she broke wind, and Caleb asked her, 'What did you mean by that?'” 

Job 18:11 has "The terrors of death suddenly beset him and make him piss over his feet." 
Ezekiel 21:7 has "all men's knees run with urine" 

Also:

"Have nothing to do with loose livers" 1 Corinthians 5:9
"Am I a babboon..." 2 Samuel 3:8
"buffaloes/bison" Isaiah 34:7
"the griffon-vulture" Deut 14:12
"guardian angels" Matthew 18:10
"mother earth" Ecclesiastes 5:15
"porpoise hides" Exodus 35:23
"dragon" Psalms 68:22
"goddesses of the field" Song of Solomon 2:7
In Proverbs 18:10 there is a quote from Shakespeare's "Richard III, 5, iii, 12.
Hebrews 12:8 has "you must be bastards"

The Matthew 16:18 reading of "You are Peter, the Rock" has a very Catholic feel to it, as does the inclusion of the Apocrypha. 

The Divine Name Jehovah is used 6 times in the book of Exodus (Ex.3:15,16; Ex.6:3; Ex.33:19; Ex.34:5,6).

The NEB is however a very readable Bible and is a complement to any present Bible version on your bookshelf, though it should not be used as a primary Bible (though I could say the same thing about the New International Version, which is a poorer Bible version). It did not catch on with the public in a lasting way, though it was successful enough to garner a revision.

One amazon reviewer noted on the Oxford Study Edition of the NEB: "Beautifully constructed language based on the earliest possible sources result in a loving and living Bible. The impressive group who did this monumental work intentionally ignored later and better known translations in order to get to the heart of the text and to use words that more closely communicate the intent and actual usage of the day. The contemporary language is not slangy or dumbed-down, either. This translation assumes you have a decent vocabulary and grasp of English, a FAR cry from the NIV, which is easy to read but does not have the rich evocative qualities that the NEB has.

Add all the Study notes, maps, etc, and this is a truly valuable and provocative Bible with many interesting historical references about the politics, commerce and customs of the day, richly added to every page as footnotes. Cross-references to other passages for clarity or reinforcement, alternative translations for some words or descriptions of items also add to the broad scope of appreciation one can get reading this lovely translation... even if you aren't Christian.

If you want to experience how beautifully the Bible can be conveyed in modern, real language, this is the Bible for you, and the study notes only make it all the more enriching."

Sunday, February 27, 2022

The Edict of Thessalonica on This Day in History

 

This Kindle book, The Dark History of the Trinity, is now available on Amazon by clicking here...and it is only 99 cents

This Day in History: The Edict of Thessalonica (also known as Cunctos populos), issued on 27 February AD 380 by three reigning Roman emperors, made the Catholicism of Nicene Christians in the Great Church the state church of the Roman Empire. It condemned other Christian creeds such as Arianism as heresies of "foolish madmen," and authorized their punishment.

The Edict is as follows: "It is our desire that all the various nations which are subject to our Clemency and Moderation, should continue to profess that religion which was delivered to the Romans by the divine Apostle Peter, as it has been preserved by faithful tradition, and which is now professed by the Pontiff Damasus and by Peter, Bishop of Alexandria, a man of apostolic holiness. According to the apostolic teaching and the doctrine of the Gospel, let us believe in the one deity of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, in equal majesty and in a Holy Trinity. We authorize the followers of this law to assume the title of Catholic Christians; but as for the others, since, in our judgment, they are foolish madmen, we decree that they shall be branded with the ignominious name of heretics, and shall not presume to give to their conventicles the name of churches. They will suffer in the first place the chastisement of the divine condemnation and in the second the punishment of our authority which in accordance with the will of Heaven we shall decide to inflict."

However, it is helpful to know much the church and the state at this time had flip-flopped on the issue of the Trinity doctrine. From wikipedia: "In 313 the emperor Constantine I, together with his eastern counterpart Licinius, issued the Edict of Milan, which granted religious toleration and freedom for persecuted Christians. By 325 Arianism, a school of christology which contended that Christ did not possess the divine essence of the Father but was rather a primordial creation and an entity subordinate to God, had become sufficiently widespread and controversial in Early Christianity that Constantine called the Council of Nicaea in an attempt to end the controversy by establishing an empire-wide, i.e., "ecumenical" orthodoxy. The council produced the original text of the Nicene Creed, which rejected the Arian confession and upheld that Christ is "true God" and "of one essence with the Father."

However, the strife within the Church did not end with Nicaea, and the Nicene credal formulation remained contentious even among anti-Arian churchmen. Constantine, while urging tolerance, began to think that he had come down on the wrong side, and that the Nicenes—with their fervid, reciprocal persecution of Arians—were actually perpetuating strife within the Church. Constantine was not baptized until he was near death (337), choosing a bishop moderately sympathetic to Arius, Eusebius of Nicomedia, to perform the baptism.

Constantine's son and successor in the eastern empire, Constantius II was partial to the Arian party, and even exiled pro-Nicene bishops. Constantius' successor Julian (later called "The Apostate") was the only emperor after the conversion of Constantine to reject Christianity, attempting to fragment the Church and erode its influence by encouraging a revival of religious diversity, calling himself a "Hellene" and supporting forms of Hellenistic religion. He championed the traditional religious cultus of Rome as well as Judaism, and furthermore declared toleration for all the various unorthodox Christian sects and schismatic movements. Julian's successor Jovian, a Christian, reigned for only eight months and never entered the city of Constantinople. He was succeeded in the east by Valens, an Arian.

By 379, when Valens was succeeded by Theodosius I, Arianism was widespread in the eastern half of the Empire, while the west had remained steadfastly Nicene. Theodosius, who had been born in Hispania, was himself a Nicene Christian and very devout. In August, his western counterpart Gratian promoted persecution of heretics in the west."

A timeline may be also be helpful to understand the confusion:

325 AD - Constantine convenes the Council of Nicaea in order to develop a statement of faith that can unify the church. The Nicene Creed is written, declaring that "the Father and the Son are of the same substance" (homoousios). Emperor Constantine who was also the high priest of the pagan religion of the Unconquered Sun presided over this council.

At the end of this council, Constantine sided with Athanasius (the chief defender of Trinitarianism) over Arius (the anti-Trinitarian who defended the position that the Son was subordinate to the Father) and exiled Arius to Illyria.

328 AD - Athanasius becomes bishop of Alexandria.

328 AD - Constantine recalls Arius from Illyria.

335 AD - Constantine now sides with Arius and exiles Athanasius to Trier.

337 AD - A new emperor, Contantius, orders the return of Athanasius to Alexandria.

339 AD - Athanasius flees Alexandria in anticipation of being expelled.

341 AD - Two councils are held in Antioch this year. During this council, the First, Second, and Third Arian Confessions are written, thereby beginning the attempt to produce a formal doctrine of faith to oppose the Nicene Creed.

343 AD - At the Council of Sardica, Eastern Bishops demand the removal of Athanasius.

346 AD - Athanasius is restored to Alexandria.

351 AD - A second anti - Nicene council is held in Sirmium.

353 AD - A council is held at Aries during Autumn that is directed against Athanasius.

355 AD - A council is held in Milan. Athanasius is again condemned.

356 AD - Athanasius is deposed on February 8th, beginning his third exile.

357 AD - Third Council of Sirmium is convened. Both homoousios and homoiousios are avoided as unbiblical, and it is agreed that the Father is greater than His subordinate Son.

359 AD - The Synod of Seleucia is held which affirms that Christ is "like the Father," It does not however, specify how the Son is like the Father.

361 AD - A council is held in Antioch to affirm Arius' positions.

380 AD - Emperor Theodosius the Great declares Christianity the official state religion of the empire.

381 AD - The First Council of Constantinople is held to review the controversy since Nicaea. Emperor Theodosius the Great establishes the creed of Nicaea as the standard for his realm. The Nicene Creed is re-evaluated and accepted with the addition of clauses on the Holy Spirit and other matters.

If you believe that Nicaea just formalized the prevalent teaching of the church, then there really should not have been any conflicts. Why should there be? If it were the established teaching of the church, then you would expect people to either accept it, or not be Christians. It would be like me being a member of the Communist Party. I would join it knowing that they do not believe in the ownership of private property, no conflict. But now, say after I have been a member of the party for a few years, someone decides to introduce a proposal that we allow the ownership of private property, not everyone in the party is going to agree, the result is conflict. This is similar to what happened in the church. It was not the established teaching, and when some faction of the church tried to make it official, the result was major conflict.

It was mainly a theological power grab by certain factions of the church. The major complication throughout all this was that the emperors were involved. At Nicaea it was Constantine that decided the outcome. Then as you can see, we have the flip-flopping of opinion with the result that Athanasius is exiled and recalled depending on who is in power. We even have in 357 AD the declaration that homoousios and homoiousios are unbiblical, and that the Father is greater than His subordinate Son.

This is 180 degrees from Nicaea. It is definitely not the Trinitarian formula.

In 380 AD Emperor Thedosius declares Christianity the state religion. One can come to the conclusion that whichever way Theodosius favors, that is the way in which it is going to end. This is exactly what happened next.

In 381 AD the struggle was finally ended by the current emperor, Theodosius the Great, who favored the Nicene position. Just like at Nicaea, the EMPEROR again decided it. The emperors were dictating the theology of the church.

The big difference now was that there was not going to be any more changing sides. It was now the state religion. You cannot make Christianity the state religion and then change its beliefs every few years. It would undermine its credibility as the true faith. The Trinity was now the orthodox position, and the state was willing to back it up. Debates however, would continue for years to come. JB

This book, "The Impersonality of the Holy Spirit by John Marsom" is available on Amazon for only 99 cents. See a local listing for it here; Buy The Absurdity of the Trinity on Amazon for only 99 cents by clicking here - see a local listing for this here

Thursday, February 17, 2022

Martyred Heretic Giordano Bruno on This Day in History


This Day in History: Giordano Bruno was burned at the stake on this day in 1600 for the crime of heresy. His crimes were believing in the heliocentric system of the universe, but also for his denial of eternal damnation, the Trinity, the divinity of Christ, the virginity of Mary, and transubstantiation. Hegel wrote that Bruno's life represented "a bold rejection of all Catholic beliefs resting on mere authority."


All of Bruno's works were placed on the Index Librorum Prohibitorum ("List of Prohibited Books") in 1603. The inquisition cardinals who judged Giordano Bruno were Cardinal Bellarmino (Bellarmine), Cardinal Madruzzo (Madruzzi), Camillo Cardinal Borghese (later Pope Paul V), Domenico Cardinal Pinelli, Pompeio Cardinal Arrigoni, Cardinal Sfondrati, Pedro Cardinal De Deza Manuel and Cardinal Santorio (Archbishop of Santa Severina, Cardinal-Bishop of Palestrina).

The measures taken to prevent Bruno continuing to speak have resulted in his becoming a symbol for free thought and free speech in present-day Rome, where an annual memorial service takes place close to the spot where he was executed.

The Vatican has published few official statements about Bruno's trial and execution. In 1942, Cardinal Giovanni Mercati, who discovered a number of lost documents relating to Bruno's trial, stated that the Church was perfectly justified in condemning him. On the 400th anniversary of Bruno's death, in 2000, Cardinal Angelo Sodano declared Bruno's death to be a "sad episode" but, despite his regret, he defended Bruno's prosecutors, maintaining that the Inquisitors "had the desire to serve freedom and promote the common good and did everything possible to save his life". In the same year, Pope John Paul II made a general apology for "the use of violence that some have committed in the service of truth".

As to his rejection of the Trinity:

"Unitarians do not find in the Bible or in reason any warrant for accepting the doctrine of the Trinity; they believe that Jesus represented himself as being, not God the Son, but the son of God, our brother, the reconciler of man to God, not of God to man. They believe that history makes it clear that the early Christian church was not Trinitarian, but Unitarian, and that the doctrines of the deity of Christ and of the Trinity came into Christianity only by degrees, and as corruptions from outside,- never being accepted by the church in any authoritative way until the council of Nicea in the year 325. They also believe that in this manner the doctrines of vicarious or substitutional atonement, total depravity, the infallibility of the Bible, etc., came in from without as corruptions of the Christian stream, and at points that are easily traced. Hence a leading aim of Unitarianism in all its later history has been to get back to the simplicity and purity of the teachings of Christ.

In the great controversy that culminated at Nicea, Athanasius was the leader of the Trinitarian party, and Arms of the Unitarian. The decision was long doubtful, but was finally turned by the Emperor Constantine in favor of the Trinitarians. Trinitarianism being thus adopted as the state religion, Unitarianism began to decline; and after the rise of the Roman Catholic church was gradually crushed out. However, Ulfilas, the eminent missionary to the Goths in the fourth century, was a Unitarian, and the Gothic nations continued to hold Christianity in its Unitarian form for several centuries.

With the revival of letters, and especially with the appearance of the Protestant Reformation in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, Unitarianism reappeared and came somewhat prominently to the front. Many noted scholars, writers, preachers, and martyrs of those times were Unitarians; among them being Servetus, Lelius and Faustas Socinus, Bernardino Ochino, Blandrata, and Francis David. The celebrated Giordano Bruno, though not calling himself a Unitarian, was in the exact line of Unitarian thought. As the Roman Catholics persecuted the Protestants, so both Catholics and Protestants combined to persecute the Unitarians." The Unitarian, 1890

See also The Terrible Death of Michael Servetus
https://newworldtranslation.blogspot.com/2019/10/the-terrible-death-of-michael-servetus.html

Unitarian History by John Hayward 1860
https://newworldtranslation.blogspot.com/2019/03/unitarian-history-by-by-john-hayward.html

Johann Sylvan - Unitarian Martyr
https://newworldtranslation.blogspot.com/2018/12/johann-sylvan-unitarian-martyr.html

The Trinity NO PART of Primitive Christianity, by James Forrest A.M. 1836
https://newworldtranslation.blogspot.com/2019/03/the-trinity-no-part-of-primitive.html

The Interrogation of Unitarian Anabaptist Martyr Herman van Vlekwijk
https://newworldtranslation.blogspot.com/2018/10/the-interrogation-of-unitarian.html

Peter Gunther, Unitarian Martyr
https://newworldtranslation.blogspot.com/2018/09/peter-gunther-unitarian-martyr.html

A Catholic Priest Declares the Trinity Doctrine "Opposed to Human Reason."
https://newworldtranslation.blogspot.com/2018/07/a-catholic-priest-declares-trinity.html

Edward Wightman (Unitarian Martyr)
https://newworldtranslation.blogspot.com/2018/07/edward-wightman-unitarian-martyr.html


Tuesday, February 8, 2022

The Revised Standard Version (RSV) Bible on This Day in History

 

Buy on Ebay

This day in history: The first portion of the Revised Standard Version of the Bible was published on this day in 1946. According to Wikipedia, the RSV was "the first serious challenge to the popularity of the Authorized King James Version." This is incorrect. The first serious challenge to the popularity of the KJV came in 1881 with the publication of the English Revised Version, followed by the American Standard Version in 1901.

The Revised Version (RV) or English Revised Version (ERV) remains the only officially authorized and recognized revision of the King James Version in Great Britain, though you would be hard-pressed to find a copy to buy. The American Standard Version has received a second life of its own online. 

While the King James Version used the Divine Name "Jehovah" 4 times (Ex.6:3, Ps.83:18, Is.12:2, Is.26:4), and the ERV used "Jehovah" 9 times and the ASV used the name almost 7000 times, the RSV went against the Hebrew text and removed all mention of the name. 


This however did not cause any controversy. What was deemed controversial was removing the word "virgin" in Isaiah 7:14 and replacing it with "young woman." Luther Hux, a pastor in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, announced his intention to burn a copy of the RSV during a sermon on November 30, 1952. This was reported in the press and attracted shocked reactions, as well as a warning from the local fire chief. On the day in question, he delivered a two-hour sermon entitled "The National Council Bible, the Master Stroke of Satan—One of the Devil's Greatest Hoaxes". After ending the sermon, he led the congregation out of the church, gave each worshipper a small American flag and proceeded to set light to the pages containing Isaiah 7:14. Hux informed the gathered press that he did not burn the Bible, but simply the "fraud" that the Isaiah pages represented. Hux later wrote a tract against the RSV entitled Modernism's Unholy Bible.

The controversy stemming from this rendering helped reignite the King-James-Only Movement within the Independent Baptist and Pentecostal churches. Furthermore, many Christians have adopted what has come to be known as the "Isaiah 7:14 litmus test", which entails checking that verse to determine whether or not a new translation can be trusted.

In the Revised Standard Version, a change was made in the usage of archaic English for second-person pronouns, "thou", "thee", "thy", and verb forms "art, hast, hadst, didst", etc. The KJV, RV, and ASV used these terms for addressing both God and humans. The RSV used archaic English pronouns and verbs only for addressing God, a fairly common practice for Bible translations until the mid-1970s.

For the New Testament, the RSV followed the latest available version of Nestle's Greek text, whereas the RV and ASV had used the Westcott and Hort Greek text, and the KJV had used the Textus Receptus.

There are several different editions of the RSV Bible. Catholics have embraced the Catholic Edition (RSV-CE Ignatius Bible). The Common Bible: An Ecumenical Edition is supposed to be an edition of the RSV for all branches of Christendom. The RSV was also the basis of the Readers Digest Bible.

In 1989, the National Council of Churches released a full-scale revision to the RSV called the New Revised Standard Version (NRSV). It was the first major version to use gender-neutral language and thus drew more criticism and ire from conservative Christians than did its 1952 predecessor. For instance, at Matthew 4:4 and RSV has "Man shall not live by bread alone" while the NRSV has "One does not live by bread alone."

As a result, Evangelicals produced their own Bible called the English Standard Version. Evangelicals also produced the New King James Version and the New American Standard Bible.

Several members of the Faculty of Dallas Theological Seminary complained in 1953 that the RSV Bible refused "to concede the full deity of Jesus Christ."

I'll let you be the judge:

Psalm 45:6 "Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever" ASV
"Your divine throne endures for ever and ever" RSV

Micah 5:2 "But thou, Beth-lehem Ephrathah, which art little to be among the thousands of Judah, out of thee shall one come forth unto me that is to be ruler in Israel; whose goings forth are from of old, from everlasting." ASV
"But you, O Bethlehem Eph'rathah, who are little to be among the clans of Judah, from you shall come forth for me one who is to be ruler in Israel, whose origin is from of old, from ancient days." RSV

Romans 9:5 "...Christ, who is God over all, forever praised." New International Version
"God, who is over all be blessed for ever." RSV

Acts 20:28  "Be shepherds of the church of God, which he bought with his own blood." NIV
"be the shepherds of the church of God, which he obtained with the blood of his own Son." Revised Standard Version

See also the footnotes at Hebrews 1:8, Titus 2:13 and 2 Peter 1:1.